When going out for lunch, I use to eat whatever I wanted without regard to the price. This was good, but usually once I found something I stuck to it, and whenever going to that restaurant, I would buy that menu item over and over.
Unfortunately, what the food that I liked was also typically one of the more expensive items on the menu, with the exception of steak meals. Lately, I’ve discovered that I can make my dollar stretch farther, if I buy soups at the more expensive restaurants. The good news is that the soup at better restaurants also taste better. For instance, when I go to Macaroni Grill, I now buy 1 of their soup menu items. They are extremely taste and very reasonably priced ($3.49 for a cup of Macaroni Grill’s tasty soups) plus, their free bread that comes with the meals is superb. I have to admit, I’m not sure that I would get the bread if I went alone and ordered just soup, but since I always go with my buddies, and they still eat large, I reap the rewards… 🙂
So in an earlier Post, I mentioned that I’m doing an experiment where I only spend $12 a week on eating lunch out. If I buy soup meals instead of the more expense meals, I can eat out 2 times a week for lunch! Booyah!
I win multiple ways with the above approach:
- I still get to save the same $40 a week for the allowance experiment.
- I get to enjoy the socialization aspect of lunch with my buddies at work.
- If I only eat out once that week, I get to save an additional $6 that week.
- I get to escape from work for an hour!
- restaurant food taste even better, after being on a diet of noodles, peanuts, and eggs.
Buying soup when going out for lunch should be considered! Try it you might be surprised…
$12 a week sounds reasonable.
I could do it if I ate hotdogs each day for lunch 😉
Yeah, the choices for me are usually soup, that soup or this soup, and occassionally a small side salad… 😀
At least whenever I do splurge and get something that isn’t soup, the meal is spectacular, and I really really enjoy it!
Pingback: Spot Budgeting | Money Reasons